The same holds as for my tripod and other diary pages: nothing on this page may be copied or changed and distributed except that the page as a whole may be printed or otherwise transfered in unchanged form, mentioning the original URL and global page reference, and that holds for everyone on the globe and beyond, including so called 'christians' and self-appointed 'Secret Services'.
Home Tripod Home Local Diary list (Secure) Tripod Diary list Previous Diary
Appearently, not much, there is no mention of this message on the board (check for yourself) At least the volunteers (no doubt the poor sods of the sys) do better in that respect.. Ever tried talking democracy (or at all for that matter) to a priest...
L.S.
refering to
http://105live.radiovaticana.org/en_feedback.html
Going over you website, I found only lets say positive statements,
and a sort of general 'everything is very fine' idea, which
of course not every person in the world agrees with.
Many people don't like the way things are, a need for war,
people building their lives on such miserable tough patterns
where they need to 'see' things which aren't there, exploitation
and oppression of many people and in many ways, poverty,
information abuse and have-nots, and much of the world
being on nothing much else than a highway to hell, which I
seem to remember vividly is not merely the thinking of
protestant reverents.
I am not a catholic, nor a jesuit, and firmly belief I should
not in any way be entangled in the great rome's web of what I
mildly call deceit. I am an internet user though, and I do take
to hart the freedom which is found there and the information,
and was wondering wether this site would adhere to common
internet and western society mores of opinion and counter
opinion, and openness to serious and unadulterated debate
and spreading of an intelligent opinion.
My own website can be found:
http://theover.tripod.com
which is a serious one, and about such subjects too, so this is not
spam.
I was wondering how much democracy and freedom and openness of
opion can be found on this site, for instance.
while your at it, the end of ramadan message and the intellectual dimention of the jesuits is interesting background material.. All this speaks about someone striving for great swelling words of vanity and the head position of all liars and whory kinds to me, no an organisation one can in their right mind or respectfully enroll in or be part of, and preferably be seen to lead with. It mightbe contageous.
- feb 6 main page
- feb 6 paper chase
- feb 10 Michael Novak
- feb 10 main page
- feb 10 paper chase
- feb 15 paper chase
- feb 17 paper chase
- feb 18 paper chase
I hope it is no problem I jump there, and that the numbering stays the same so that I point at the right page also in the future. The official entrance to her paintpages, with the java applet to add some art yourself is here.
The Two Babylons
or The Papal Worship
Proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife
By the Late Rev.
Alexander Hislop
I've also stored the pages on this server, in case the original gets removed or unreachable, and so I can index and search it in due time.Rev. Hislop's work has lately been questioned, most notably by Ralph Woodrow's book "The Babylon Connection" (excerpts at http://users.clarkston.com./rcorson/2babylons.htm). I have read that particular book and find it unconvincing and confusing in its own right and still feel that "The Two Babylons'" inclusion on this website is warranted as a scholarly work delving into the area of error within the church (wherever it's found and from wherever it came— ultimately IS Babylon). You will not get too far in your research of church history without coming across references to this book and that is the reason we have included it here— a reference work not as something to be used to beat someone else over the head with (like some use the Bible itself).